Mixbus 32c create fade at end of song4/16/2023 ![]() Everything in the individual channels works correctly - FX are inserted where they should, and the pre/post controls work sensibly. If the master fader (the GUI thingy) could be connected to EITHER the pre-FX master volume or the post-FX master volume, that would take care of this issue. The master has three level controls, but the fader is, as far as I can tell, attached to the "post-fx" level in the master only. If this option is only added post-master fader, it shouldnt affect the other volume envelopes before the master fader. ![]() pre-fader on the master channel.įinal mix>exciter>masterfader>compress/eq/limit/dither>render Or maybe that should be a configuration option.Īgreed.but the only plugins i want post-fader are limiter, compressor, eq and dither (like on a mixing desk:)), and only on the master fader, but i still want to put an exciter, widener etc. (similar to the channel-strip in cubase/nuendo, where the last 2 slots are for post-fader fx). Just add a small devider below the effects in the fx-browser -> dragging an fx to this section (below the devider) would then set them post-fader. That's right, but an option to set fx to post-fader would be a great addition and save us from using the pre-fx volume envelope. "Katz's explanations of the requirement for dither in any digital system and how dithering works are simple to understand, but technically accurate." Or maybe that should be a configuration option.Ĭertainly the combination of a master-fader fadeout and dither is only going to work right if the dither is post-fader.Įxactly.some people arent interested in dithering, some are, like Bob Katz. One could argue that the trim control should have been set pre FX in the first place (more like a physical mixer) rather than post FX as at present. All three can be in operation at once, but only one is shown on the interface at a time.Ĭhanging the relationship between the three faders and the FX would be pretty fundamental, but IMHO providing a single display of the three faders by a right click on the displayed fader would be less so and might relieve some of the confusion about their operation. The design at the moment is intended to be more flexible, that is, having three faders, one a non-automatable post FX trim, the other two being automatable and located pre and post FX respectively. I think what you would like is to have one fader but place the FX in different places in respect of it. If you always want to have master FX post fader, set up your default project that way perhaps with the likely FX already in place. ![]() Use the JS or 3rd party volume control effect at the start of the chain. Shouldn't mastering plugins also be run post-master-fader? Certainly the combination of a master-fader fadeout and dither is only going to work right if the dither is post-fader. If the "grab all faders and slid" reduces them by an equal number of decibels, it won't mess up your mix, but I don't know if this is how it is computed or not.īut it is something to be aware of if you use level-controlled effects - they aren't tolerant of levels widely outside their normal range. Given that the "mix high and attenuate later" approach is not really necessary in REAPER, it's best to just fix this one (the Jesusonic thing or the master envelope will do just fine for one song). The fact that it's a drag on analog gear too doesn't make it any better. The only problem is, once you've set up a whole mix, it's a drag to change them all to get a reasonable master level. It's floating point, so whether 32-bit or 64-bit, it has such a ridiculous dynamic range that you needn't worry about it, wherever you run your levels. The same thing happens if someone mixes too low, and compensates with master fader gain - compressors, gates, exciters don't work. Level-sensitive effects tend to assume an operating level somewhere below 0db, regardless of their potential dynamic range, which in the VST world is enormous. ![]() This problem can happen with other level-sensitive effects (exciter-type things, de-essers, gates).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |